<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project management in the age of Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/</link>
	<description>Sharing my experiences, impressions and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetersOpinion</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>PetersOpinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay, thanks for your reply. You are right, the link was wrong. I replaced it with the appropriate one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay, thanks for your reply. You are right, the link was wrong. I replaced it with the appropriate one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Gao</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Gao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Hi nice post.&lt;br&gt;I noticed that you have a link linking to &lt;a href=&quot;http://prince2.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prince2.com&lt;/a&gt; using the text PRINCE2. I thought you probably meant to link to the official prince2 website: prince2.org.uk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is probably more appropriate to link to prince2.org.uk, especially that APMG (the accreditation body of PRINCE2) is becoming increasingly concerned with the copyright issues in terms of domains that contain the word PRINCE2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out of good faith I thought you might want to know this and update the link.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;best regards,&lt;br&gt;Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi nice post.<br />I noticed that you have a link linking to <a href="http://prince2.com" rel="nofollow">prince2.com</a> using the text PRINCE2. I thought you probably meant to link to the official prince2 website: prince2.org.uk.</p>
<p>It is probably more appropriate to link to prince2.org.uk, especially that APMG (the accreditation body of PRINCE2) is becoming increasingly concerned with the copyright issues in terms of domains that contain the word PRINCE2.</p>
<p>Out of good faith I thought you might want to know this and update the link.</p>
<p>best regards,<br />Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetersOpinion</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>PetersOpinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Hi Craig, thanks for your reply. In general I also prefer to follow a more flexible approach that fit the client best. Several methodologies are just to strict. I prefer cherry picking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig, thanks for your reply. In general I also prefer to follow a more flexible approach that fit the client best. Several methodologies are just to strict. I prefer cherry picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetersOpinion</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>PetersOpinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Hi Craig, thanks for your reply. In general I also prefer to follow a more flexible approach that fit the client best. Several methodologies are just to strict. I prefer cherry picking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig, thanks for your reply. In general I also prefer to follow a more flexible approach that fit the client best. Several methodologies are just to strict. I prefer cherry picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Thanks Pradeep for your great reply. For sure I agree that both Prince2 and Agile have useful parts. And when you are looking for control Prince2 could suit you better while running a big project. However, the question is how an Agile approach could change &quot;big&quot; projects. There are already several benchmarks available that prove that an Agile approach results in big efficiency gains for big projects as well. The main issue is probably that many people prefer to choose the safe route. Hardly any project manager will be fired for choosing Prince2. But if the project would fail because of an Agile approach ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pradeep for your great reply. For sure I agree that both Prince2 and Agile have useful parts. And when you are looking for control Prince2 could suit you better while running a big project. However, the question is how an Agile approach could change &#8220;big&#8221; projects. There are already several benchmarks available that prove that an Agile approach results in big efficiency gains for big projects as well. The main issue is probably that many people prefer to choose the safe route. Hardly any project manager will be fired for choosing Prince2. But if the project would fail because of an Agile approach &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep Bhanot</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep Bhanot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Both Prince and Agile have value to add to a project. I advocate using Prince to run the bigger project, provide milestones, measures and some best practice templates. Most large software projects do not need an agile approach of every deliverable. Many organizations use traditional SDLC methods for most of the project and use agile for critical, time sensitive original coding. There is a place for use of both in a single project, but Agile is great for individual deliverables, but you do need more than Agile to manage the overall project. 

At CA we provide a Prince accelerator for the overall project control methodology and support agile practices within the CA Software Change Manager supported deliverables, where needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Prince and Agile have value to add to a project. I advocate using Prince to run the bigger project, provide milestones, measures and some best practice templates. Most large software projects do not need an agile approach of every deliverable. Many organizations use traditional SDLC methods for most of the project and use agile for critical, time sensitive original coding. There is a place for use of both in a single project, but Agile is great for individual deliverables, but you do need more than Agile to manage the overall project. </p>
<p>At CA we provide a Prince accelerator for the overall project control methodology and support agile practices within the CA Software Change Manager supported deliverables, where needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply Santex. To be honest, I feel a bit the same. I prefer to look for simplicity as well. An overkill of procedures and tools is not productive. It&#039;s a real challenge to find the proper balance and I am not going to claim that I found the best balance yet. Sometimes it is just &quot;trial and error&quot; to find the best working way. Besides every project and every client demand different approaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Santex. To be honest, I feel a bit the same. I prefer to look for simplicity as well. An overkill of procedures and tools is not productive. It&#8217;s a real challenge to find the proper balance and I am not going to claim that I found the best balance yet. Sometimes it is just &#8220;trial and error&#8221; to find the best working way. Besides every project and every client demand different approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santex</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Santex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-103</guid>
		<description>It is kind of a pain that projects these days or so overcomplicated that we need to use all of these complicated project management tools, but complicated results need complicated processes i guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is kind of a pain that projects these days or so overcomplicated that we need to use all of these complicated project management tools, but complicated results need complicated processes i guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and support Jefferson. I am curious how you are jumping into that direction with your services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and support Jefferson. I am curious how you are jumping into that direction with your services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://petersopinion.com/2009/05/28/project-management-in-the-age-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=218#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Yes I do agree Peter. 

Project management is changing. We need to go from very strict and formal ways of managing projects to a more flexible way with this availability of Online tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I do agree Peter. </p>
<p>Project management is changing. We need to go from very strict and formal ways of managing projects to a more flexible way with this availability of Online tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
