Comments on: If you aren’t on YouTube yet, better make you are soon http://petersopinion.com/2010/03/11/if-you-arent-on-youtube-yet-better-make-you-are-soon/ Sharing my experiences, impressions and thoughts Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:13:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: TimOnWeb http://petersopinion.com/2010/03/11/if-you-arent-on-youtube-yet-better-make-you-are-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-197 TimOnWeb Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:41:59 +0000 http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=474#comment-197 Well, in terms of 'direct SEO' and 'link juice' they are useless, cause no rank passing happens, but they can be very helpful if other notice them and post about your content in their blogs.<br><br>Thanks to this post, I've discovered a <a href="http://cmo.com" rel="nofollow">cmo.com</a>, a very interesting resource! Well, in terms of 'direct SEO' and 'link juice' they are useless, cause no rank passing happens, but they can be very helpful if other notice them and post about your content in their blogs.

Thanks to this post, I've discovered a cmo.com, a very interesting resource!

]]> By: PetersOpinion.com http://petersopinion.com/2010/03/11/if-you-arent-on-youtube-yet-better-make-you-are-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-196 PetersOpinion.com Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:23:18 +0000 http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=474#comment-196 Tim, one additional comment. I believe we misunderstood the SEO column. This column shows how well these social networks are optimized for search engines. The better their SEO the higher the chance you will be noticed on them. Tim, one additional comment. I believe we misunderstood the SEO column. This column shows how well these social networks are optimized for search engines. The better their SEO the higher the chance you will be noticed on them.

]]> By: PetersOpinion http://petersopinion.com/2010/03/11/if-you-arent-on-youtube-yet-better-make-you-are-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-195 PetersOpinion Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:47:29 +0000 http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=474#comment-195 Hi Tim, thanks for your reply. I basically agree with you. Both are at the maximum traffic generators by linking to your website. Flickr in itself might be able to attract traffic if you position your pictures well, resulting in a click through to your website. But a warning is applicable: Flickr doesn't allow commercial use. Hi Tim, thanks for your reply. I basically agree with you. Both are at the maximum traffic generators by linking to your website. Flickr in itself might be able to attract traffic if you position your pictures well, resulting in a click through to your website. But a warning is applicable: Flickr doesn't allow commercial use.

]]> By: Tim http://petersopinion.com/2010/03/11/if-you-arent-on-youtube-yet-better-make-you-are-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-194 Tim Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:33:58 +0000 http://www.petersopinion.com/?p=474#comment-194 Interesting study, thanks for sharing this one, Peter. But can't agree that Flickr is helpful for SEO, the have nofollow on links, same for delicious, so it can help SEO only if your piece of content is hot on these services and people are building natural backlinks because of that. Interesting study, thanks for sharing this one, Peter. But can't agree that Flickr is helpful for SEO, the have nofollow on links, same for delicious, so it can help SEO only if your piece of content is hot on these services and people are building natural backlinks because of that.

]]>